Legality of Objectives and Consideration

Subject: Business Law

Overview

Another need of a contract is that it be formed with legal goals in mind. Contracts that are against the law or the public interest won't be upheld by the courts. Such contracts are regarded as invalid. A gaming contract, for instance, would be prohibited in many circumstances. Neither party has the right to sue the other for damages if the illegal agreement hasn't been carried out, nor may they rely on the other party to do so. If the agreement has been carried out, neither party may bring a claim for damages against the other or seek the annulment of the contract.

Another need of a contract is that it be formed with legal goals in mind. Contracts that are against the law or the public interest won't be upheld by the courts. Such contracts are regarded as invalid. A gaming contract, for instance, would be prohibited in many circumstances.

Neither party has the right to sue the other for damages or to rely on the fulfillment of the illegal agreement if it hasn't been carried out. If the agreement has been carried out, neither party may bring a claim for damages against the other or seek the annulment of the contract.

For instance, Saurav asked Dhoni to find a customer for his restaurant in exchange for 20% of the sale price if Dhoni was successful. Dhoni neither claimed to have nor had a real estate license. Dhoni found a buyer and received 50 percent of the commission. Saurav declined to pay any extra commission, claiming that since Dhoni did not possess a realtor's license as required by state law, he was not compelled to. Saurav, are you right? Additionally, Saurav stated that Dhoni was had to repay the portion of the commission he had previously given to Dhoni. Is this accurate?

Saurav is right that Dhoni shouldn't be entitled to the remaining commission because he violated the state's licensing law by posing as a realtor without a license. The agreement between Saurav and Dhoni to pay a commission was invalid and cannot be enforced. However, Saurav is mistaken in his assertion that Dhoni must reimburse him for the portion of the commission he received from Saurav and gave to Dhoni. A court will not assist either party in upholding an unlawful contract. The majority of the time, any kind of remedy is not available to participants to an illegal arrangement. An illegal agreement cannot be enforced by a court, and failure to execute by both parties cannot result in damages being awarded.

A contract may call for the fulfillment of numerous promises, some of which may be in violation of the law. If the legal and illegal portions of the agreement can be distinguished, the legal portion may be enforced. The legal provisions of the agreement will not be imposed or enforced, however, if the illegal features are such that they would damage the entire agreement. An Agreement shall be construed as legal whenever practical. In other words, if an agreement is open to both a legal and an illegal reading, the Court will typically choose the legal justification unless it is obvious that the illegal interpretation is plainly expressed.

An agreement that entails the commission of a crime is invalid since it is against the law. An agreement to burn an automobile with another party, for instance, could not be enforced. Additionally, a contract that calls for the conduct of a civil wrong (such as a tort) is unlawful and null and void. An agreement to disparage a third party, for instance, is invalid.

Normally, a court won't take into account whether a contract is silly or sensible, unjust or fair. Courts will, however, occasionally rule that a contract cannot be upheld because it is unfair or oppressive to one of the parties. Depending on the situation, a clause in a contract that states that a party will incur a significant fine if he breaches the agreement might not be enforceable. Another illustration would be if one side consented that the other wouldn't be held accountable for the results of egregious negligence. Normally, a contract of this nature would be void and illegal, being against public policy.

Agreements that could be detrimental to the general welfare are against public policy and are not enforceable. Even if an agreement does not violate a law, the public may find it so repugnant that courts will determine that forcing it would be against public policy. It might be challenging to assess whether a contract is stubborn to public policy because the word "public policy" is vague. The idea of public policy is to protect the public from something that likely to be damaging to the public, is detrimental to the common good, or violates a social norm. Contracts that violate public policy typically concern the preservation of the general welfare, safety, or health of the public, to the protection of the person; or the protection of recognized social firms. For example, a contract that would interdict some­one from marrying would be unenforceable as violating public policy.

Public policy would be violated by a contract that requires a person to give up some type of legal protection. For instance, insurance legislation typically stipulate that plans of a particular category (such as medical covers) must have a specified amount of profits. According to the statute, an insurance policy would be against public policy if it did not provide these advantages.

A contract that prevents a public official from doing their duties properly is against public policy and is invalid. A contract between a mayor and a private person, for instance, would provide that the private citizen would pay the mayor Rs 10,000 in exchange for the mayor appointing the citizen's son as his executive assistant.

Conflicts of interest clauses in agreements can be illegal or unenforceable for breaking public policy, such as when a government buying officer purchases from a business that the officer also owns privately.

Any contract that seeks to thwart the judicial system is unenforceable because it violates public policy. Imagine, for instance, that an attorney in a case involving therapeutic malpractice offered to pay his expert witness, a doctor, Rs10,000 for testifying and an additional Rs15,000 if the attorney's client won the case. This contract would be invalid or illegal. The risk could occur because a witness might tell a lie to support the prosecution's case.

The majority of nations have laws outlawing contracts involving gambling. Lotteries that have a chance component, a prize, or a payment are also seen as illegal. Of course, a nation may permit the operation of a national lottery or may legalize gambling in general. Bingo games, lotteries, and raffles may be lawful in some nations if the proceeds are donated to a good cause. Plans for giveaways and games are acceptable as long as attendance does not require payment or a gift of value. There is no lottery if attendance is free since there is no element of consideration.

Before engaging in certain professions, like those of law or medicine, or engaging in certain businesses, like those of a stock broker or real estate broker, it is mandated by law that a person hold a license or certificate. Any contract established by an unlicensed person in the course of his or her medical practice would be illegal or void if the license is required to safeguard the public against incapable people, such as an unlicensed doctor. The Court ruled that if an unlicensed contractor entered into a contract to do repairs, the contractor would not be able to recover from the owner either the fee stipulated in their contract or the true worth of the services actually rendered because of their unlicensed status. If a license is rigorously a revenue raiser, such as a privilege license to conduct a store at a certain location, it would be rare for an agreement made in abuse of the licensing statute to be held unsound. Somebody operating a store without permission would not have its entire sales declared illegal/void, but it might be fined for failure to get the appropriate license.

Reference:

  • Akrani, G. (2011, 09 2). kalyan-city. Retrieved from http://kalyan-city.blogspot.com/: http://kalyan-city.blogspot.com/2011/02/what-is-cheque-definition-kinds-and.html
  • Bragg, S. (2011). accountingtools. Retrieved from www.accountingtools.com: http://www.accountingtools.com/questions-and-answers/what-is-a-bill-of-exchange.html
  • Business Law, Ram Prasad Shrestha;M.K Books, Bhotahity, Kathmandu,2013
  • Collins Dictionary of Law © W.J. Stewart, 2006
  • Ghai, K. (n.d.). yourarticlelibrary. Retrieved from http://www.yourarticlelibrary.com/essay/law-essay/law-meaning-features-sources-and-types-of-law/40363/
  • Law, E. o. (2008). thefreedictionary. Retrieved from thefreedictionary.com: http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/promissory+note
  • Shrestha, R. P. (2007). Business Law. Kathmandu: M.K.Books.
  • US Legal, I. (1997). uslegal. Retrieved from uslegal.com: http://contracts.uslegal.com/lawful-objective/
Things to remember

Another need of a contract is that it be formed with legal goals in mind. Contracts that are against the law or the public interest won't be upheld by the courts. Such contracts are regarded as invalid. A gaming contract, for instance, would be prohibited in many circumstances.

Neither party has the right to sue the other for damages or to rely on the fulfillment of the illegal agreement if it hasn't been carried out. If the agreement has been carried out, neither party may bring a claim for damages against the other or seek the annulment of the contract.

 

© 2021 Saralmind. All Rights Reserved.